Monday, June 14, 2010

Holy Talk: Iglesia Ni Cristo vs Roman Catholic Debate

I am fond of reading Bible and engaging in informal debate and bible sharing.
Normally, the two persons in debate tried to show proofs or verses of the Bible in different versions just to back up their claims, arguments or beliefs. Then whenever one uses a questionable verse in proving something, the other one tries to show or prove that the verse he used is erroneously translated. I haven’t yet witness a debate that one of the debater tried to deceive the audience, his opponents or the moderator by changing a page of certain version ofthe Bible, not until I found this video:
The debate was held on August 5, 2006. The Iglesia ni Cristo was represented by Brother Ramil Parba while the Roman Catholic Church was represented by Mr. Talibong. Usually, in formal debates the Roman Catholic Church in the Philippines is represented by one of the members of the Catholic Defender.
What happened is that during the show down, Mr. Talibong argued that he can read a verse that clearly said that Christ build the Holy Apostolic Roman Catholic Church. The verse is Matthew 16:18 in the Confraternity Bible. The only problem is that the Catholic Defenders changed the page where the Matt. 16:18 was printed with the page they wrote by themselves.
The original text of the Matt 16:18 of the Confraternity Version goes: “…. I will build my church…” What the Catholic Defenders did was changed that part to: “… I will build my Holy Apostolic Catholic Roman Church…”
And just like what Brother Parba cried, it’s really a deception!

2 comments:

  1. bakit po nagawang mandaya ng pastor ng katoliko? nakakahiya po...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hindi lang sa mga public debate mandaraya ang mga Catholic defender kundi maging sa kanilang mga blog. Marami na akong ipinadalang comment na walang foul words kundi reasonable arguments o mga tanong ngunit itinatago nila sa public dahil sa magiging kahiya-hiya lang sila. Ito ang mga halimbawa ng site nila na maraming valid comment ngunit itinatago nila sa reading public:

    http://catholiceternaltruth.blogspot.com/2010/12/false-accusation-answered.html

    http://thesplendorofthechurch.blogspot.com/2011/02/mga-katanungan-hingil-sa-retraction-ni.html

    Subukan ninyo na itanong kung:

    Bakit magkakaiba ang inilabas nila na retraksyon ni Rizal?

    Bakit ang patotoo ng kapatid ni Rizal ay wala namang ipinakitang retraksyon sa kanila ang mga pare kundi noong lamang 1935 lumabas ang inimbento nilang retraksyon na namali pa ang petsa at iba pang detalye kaya kailangan na namang doktorin?

    Sa Catholic eternal truth
    Bakit hindi nila maipost ang iba pang mga comment at reply sa kanila lalo na ang mga argumento mula kay GeB at sa marami pang iba

    ReplyDelete